A report of an interesting case, wherein Mr. Francis Doyle of Carrick-on-Suir,
merchant and cloth-manufacturer, was plaintiff, and Sir Thomas Judkin
Fitzgerald, high-sheriff of the county of Tipperary, in the year 1798,
was defendant
tried and determined at Clonmel spring assizes, Monday, April 9, 1801,
before Lord Avonmore.
REPORT, &c.
COUNSEL
FOR PLAINTIFF |
FOR
DEFENDANT |
Mr. Fletcher,
Mr. Burrowes,
Mr. Driscol,
Mr. Bush,
Hon. Mr. Yelverton. |
Mr. Egan,
Mr. O'Dwyer
Mr. Lloyd,
Mr. Pennefather,
Mr. Going |
THIS
important and interesting cause, a cause
which engaged the attention, and excited the expectation of the public mind for
these three years past, was tried at the last Spring assizes for the county of
Tipperary, held in Clonmel, on Monday the 9th of April, 1801, before Lord
Avenmore, who presided as Judge, and an uncommonly crowded Court.
The Honourable Mr. YELVERTON, as counsel for the plaintiff,
opened the case : after which, Mr. FLETCHER, on behalf of the plaintiff also
arose, and in an animated, energetic and argumentative speech, addressed the
Jury nearly to the following purport:
Gentlemen of the Jury The present case is one of the most
extraordinary and aggravating, ever before introduced into a court of justice.
It is an action of trespass, vi et armis, instituted by
4
my client, to recover damages for an assault, battery, and
false imprisonment, committed by the defendant, at Carrick-on-Suir, in this
county, against the plaintiff, on Friday, June the 22d, 1798. The damages, my
client has laid at five thousand pounds. The defendant has pleased the general
issue, and also a special justification under the acts of parliament;
notwithstanding which he has, for these three years past, under various
pretences, evaded a trial.
Mr. Francis Doyle, my client, and plaintiff in the case, is a
respectable inhabitant of the town of Carrick-on-Suir, and there follows a
respectable trade, amassing a rapid fortune by the well directed exertions of
his honest industry. He is a man not less distinguished in society for his
punctuality, his steady principles and irreproachable character, than his
unimpeached loyalty to his king, obedience to the laws, and attachment to the
constitution of his country.
The defendant, Colonel Fitzgerald, is a man of great hereditary
property, and has been, from his infantine age, employed in the cultivation of
his mind, and in the acquisition of science and literature; thus imbibing from
the celebrated sages of Greece and Rome, those principles of knowledge, which so
strongly inculcate the love of virtue, the abhorrence of despotism, and the
dignity of human nature. After thus receiving all the advantages of a highly
polished education, we find him engaged in the honourable profession of the law,
the study of which, above all others, eminently qualifies men for the
magisterial offices of the state, by rendering them intimately a acquainted with
the various obligations of social order. I knew Col. Fitzgerald at College, and
5
when studying the law. I then thought him a man of a good
disposition; but what was my subsequent astonishment and surprise, on hearing
that by some unaccountable fatality, his soul became totally transformed, his
blood corrupted, and the mild of human kindness curdled into gall.
In the year 1798, Col. Fitzgerald was high sheriff of this
county, in which capacity it was peculiarly incumbent on him rather to prevent
than promote every atrocious outrage of the nature here complained of. To you,
Gentlemen of the Jury, who are all men of sensibility, honour and information, I
appeal, whether he can plead ignorance in extenuation of excuse for the
illegality of his proceedings, and inhumanity of his conduct, toward my unhappy
client. On you, then, Gentlemen of the Jury, I call for damages.I call upon you
for damages.Yes, Gentlemen, I againI again call upon you for damages, as far
as money can be deemed an equivalent atonement for my client's unparalleled
sufferings.
On the 22d of June, 1798, the defendant, Col. Fitzgerald,
entered Carrick-on-Suir, at that time in the most perfect state of peace and
tranquility. He came, attended by a troop of foreigners and a corps of yeomanry.
He was accompanied by a man of the name of Stephen Devany; a man, long before,
notorious for his abandoned and infamous character, who was taken from the jail
of Clonmel, and, as a ransom for his forfeited life, became one of these
abominable pests of society, a common informer. Among his attendants, were some
drummers too, the dreadful instruments of his torture. There he found the
miserable plaintiff, who was a member
6
of Captain Jephson's yeomanry corps, and in that era of
universal alarm, had always been uniformly attentive to the duties of a soldier.
Him the defendant found in the act of accoutering himself preparatory to the
performance of such services as his officer may deem necessary for maintaining
his sovereign's authority, and a due subordination to the laws. He was
instantaneously attacked and assaulted by the sheriff, and charged on the
unsupported information of the perjured Devany with being a rebel, and supplying
the disaffected with pikes. Doyle foolishly thinking innocence a sufficient
protection against the fury of this barbarian, denied the charge. Fitzgerald
declared he would flog. Doyle threw himself on his knees, implored, entreated,
and besought him by every argument that conscious innocence could supply, to
grant him that which has been hitherto deemed the unalienable right of every
subject under our constitutiona trial. The respectable gentlemen of the
neighbouring country, whose duty necessitated them to accompany the chief
magistrate of the county, in order to assist him with their abilities and
advice, convinced of Doyle's innocence from their personal acquaintance with
him, and that intimate knowledge of his private character, which their local
situation afforded them, joined him in his solicitations for a trial.
Ineffectual was the interposition of the neighbouring magistrates, who, from
similar motives, interceded for Doyle.--- To no purpose they knew Doyle to be a
loyal man---to no purpose did they urge Doyle's uniform propriety of conduct in
life, and consequently the improbability of committing the crime laid to his
charge---to no purpose did they represent the small degree of credit to be
attached to Devanny's evidence---to no purpose did they urge their personal
knowledge of that infamous informer's perjury. Deaf to all arguments, and
equally inexorable to all entreaties, Fitzgerald ordered the fatal ladder to be
erected, and after repeatedly striking the miserable victim, still prostrate on
his knees, in the degrading posture of a petitioning suppliant, he dragged him
to the ladder, had his hands tied, and got him flogged. After his mangled flesh
was lacerated and torn off from between his shoulders, the unfeeling Fitzgerald
ordered his breeches-strings to be untied, and as if stimulated by a brutal and
sanguinary passion for flagellation, he caused the stripes to be inflicted on
the writhing victims bare posteriors, in a manner so dreadfully sever, so
shocking to the feelings of humanity, as must affect the breast of every person,
who deserves the appellation of man. Thus, with unrelenting severity, did he
receive on hundred lashes! But why dwell upon so dreadfully disgusting a
subject, or harrow up your sensibility by a further description. You shall take
it from the mouths of the witnesses. I shall not pollute mine by a further
recital. Scarce were fifty stripes inflicted, when the miserable sufferer
fainted under the torture. His fleeting senses were recalled; but to what
purpose? To inflict fifty more! Good God, Gentlemen of the Jury, can you believe
it---on his being let down from the ladder, the humane colonel, after thus
mangling his flesh, still adding insult and mockery to his sufferings,
tauntingly told him, he should undergo the same operation, and receive a similar
number of lashes, next day!
What must the principles, nay the Roman fortitude of that man
be? What the feelings of his
8
relatives and family? What the sympathy of his fellow-yeomen
who were arrayed on the occasion , and drawn up to be tame spectators of this
ignominious fight?what?were they rebels?they must be men of more than human
patience, submissively to bear with such a dreadful spectacle, as that of having
their neighbour, friend and fellow-soldier, thus contumeliously punished before
them, and that with arms in their hands.
On what evidence, Gentlemen of the Jury, was this done? On the
unsupported evidence of a perjured informer; one of those wretched tools of
tyranny; one of those execrable instruments of despotism, resorted to in the
unhappy reign of Tiberius. Well did the cobbler know, that he may here vent his
rage and malice with impunity.
But what actuated the defendant, Colonel Fitzgerald, to these
acts of wanton and unprovoked cruelty?Loyalty it could not be. Could a person
whom we have seen disregarding all law, and mocking all religion, be esteemed
loyal? Could the person whom we have seen provoking the well-affected to acts of
insurrection by his arbitrary and illegal actions, what to ascribe his conduct
to. You, Gentlemen of the Jury, must cogently feel what will induce you to grant
him a verdict.
The defendant is a lawyer, and consequently conversant in all
the intricate subtleties of the law, notwithstanding which, he rests not his
defence on the fair justice of his cause, but puts his total reliance on the two
indemnity acts. The more particular interpretation of those acts you, Gentlemen
of the Jury, will hear from the noble
9
Lord, who presides on the Bench. I shall only observe,
Gentlemen, that the fist states, that disturbances existed in the country; that
many persons have illegally acted in order to suppress them. To all who have so
acted, it grants an indemnity with this condition, however, that they have so
acted on reasonable grounds. Under this act the defendant cannot screen himself.
The reasonable grounds fail him. Where was the urgency of inflicting
instantaneous punishment, especially in the town of Carrick, a town which, as
shall be satisfactorily proved in the evidence to be immediately adduced, was
then in a state of the most profound tranquility and peace. Why was not Doyle
detained, if the defendant thought there were the least grounds of suspicion
against him? Or why did he not hold some court of inquiry, composed of the
officers or magistrates then present, on Doyle, before the infliction of
torture.
The second act limits the time of bringing actions of this kind;
this part does not bear against my client's café, for the present action has
been brought within the time prescribed. This act next enacts, that to render a
verdict for the plaintiff of any avail, in café the defendant set up
state-necessity for his defence, the Jury must find that the defendant acted
maliciously. Now, Gentlemen of the Jury, his Lordship will tell your from the
Bench, that the malice here meant, is not personal malice towards the
individual, but what in law is called legal malice. It is that species of
malice, which the Sheriff's conduct in Carrick on that day sufficiently evinced,
whereby it is evident, that the operating principle by which he was actuated
towards the inhabitants of that town, was an evil disposition towards mankind.
10
It is not, it cannot be an individual malice to any
particular man, but it is the same malice with that which, in law, constitutes
murder. To justify you, Gentlemen of the Jury, in refusing to certify, you must
be thoroughly convinced that it was necessity, imperious in its nature, and
admitting of no delay, which compelled him to the illegal commission of those
atrocious enormities against the peaceable inhabitants of that town.
But supposing for a moment his motives were pure. Consider,
Gentlemen, the means employed by the defendant. Good God! What could justify a
High Sheriff, one of the first officers of the land, in the commission of the
most wanton acts of indiscriminate and unprovoked aggression and outrage, ever
perpetrated; in branding with the promiscuous appellations of traitors and
rebels; in violently assaulting all with his sword; in forcibly pulling off
their hats from their heads; in compelling them to kneel down before him, at the
same time, in a mandatory tone, and with a terrific countenance"how dare
"the rebels stand with their hats on in the presence "of
majesty." But what, above all, could instigate him to the infliction of
torture, a species of punishment, now thank God, banished from every civilized
state in Europe, and scarcely known among the rude and uncultivated subjects of
northern despots. Torture has been always prohibited, even during the darkest
ages of superstition and ignorance, by our constitution; and on taking a
retrospective view of this present period, what will posterity say, when they
find that torture has been resorted to, at the close of the eighteenth century,
recognized under the British government, and inflicted in the reign of George
11
the Third, a beneficent prince, who has extended his empire
over the hearts of his people, and secured their obedience, not by terrific
measures, but by the more conciliatory means of affection and regard.
Need I call your attention to the opinion, delivered in the
Imperial Parliament by the Attorney General of England, a kingdom now
constituting a part of the same empire with our own, on a motion for inserting a
clause in the Martial Law Act, then passing there, in order to prohibit the use
of torture. He opposed the clause, "be" cause," says he, "it
cannot but be known to "every one, that neither martial law, nor any
"other law, either human or divine, can justify "its application, or
authorize its infliction." It was well-observed by that great philosopher
and martyr, who, though living under the frowns of tyranny and despotism, soared
nobly superior to the prejudices of his countrymen and the superstitions of an
ignorant age, that "truth can "never be ascertained by the
torture;" for tho' the guilty culprit may be induced to acknowledge his
offense, in order to obtain a temporary respite from that punishment due to the
enormity of his crimes, the innocent man, under the agonizing pressure of
unmerited torture, will readily own the commission of imaginary guilt, for
hastening his dissolution, and ridding him of his material part, in order to
expedite his arrival at that desirable point, whence he may wing his way to the
regions of eternal bliss.
I shall conclude, Gentlemen, by observing, that the divine
spirit of our happy constitution remunerated a poor tenant in a neighbouring
county for the oppressive conduct of his landlord
12
towards him, with damages amounting to £ 1500, and that with
the approbation of the noble Lord, who now presides here as Judge. Gracious God!
Gentlemen, if a bare imprisonment could warrant such damages, what can be
esteemed a sufficient recompense for the undeserved sufferings of my unhappy
client? Who can appreciate, with equivalent damages, the writhing agonies of his
tortured body, and the consequent injury done to his health? Add to these
irreparable wrongs, the anguish of his mind for the ignominy of his treatment,
and the impeachment of his hitherto irreproachable character. With you alone,
Gentlemen of the Jury, it remains to wipe away this foul imputation, this
infamous stain from off the land, by not withholding from a miserable victim, on
whose lacerated limbs the defendant's eyes were feasted with more than savage
complacency and satisfaction, those pecuniary damages, to which he is
confessedly entitled. On this extraordinary occasion, Gentlemen, your conduct
and determination, as Jurors will be minutely canvassed. Look around this
crowded court; here you see the eyes of the county fixed on you, while the
province, the kingdom at large, nay the whole empire are in anxious expectation
of the decision of this important trial. You see then the necessity of showing
your abhorrence of such acts of wanton cruelty against outraged humanity. Let
the damages laid, be to the full extent, I conjure you, as your verdict this day
will highly tend to the establishment or extinction of the liberties of your
fellow-subjects, and the constitutional rights of your country.
13
Stephen Russell, Esq. sworn and examined by Plaintiff's
Counsel.
Do you know F. Doyle, the plaintiff, and Col. Fitzgerald, the
defendant?
A, Yes, I do.
Q, Did you see them on the 22nd June, 1798, in Carrick-on-Suir?
A. I did.
Q. In what capacity did you go to Carrick, on that day?
A. I went there as a yeoman, under the command of Mr. Parsons, a
Lieut. in Captain Hutchinson's yeomanry corps.
Q. Who commanded the detachment sent to Carrick, that day?
A. Col. Fitzgerald seemed to have the command of it.
Q. Did you see a man of the name of Devany, with the detachment
going to Carrick that morning?
A. Yes, I did.
Q. What was this man's general character?
A. A most infamous one.
Q. Did Col. Fitzgerald give any particular orders respecting Doyle
on that day?
A. He gave directions to have him tied to a ladder erected there.
Q. Did the Colonel use any violence in bringing Doyle to the
ladder?
A. Col. Fitzgerald endeavoured to force Doyle forward.
Q. Why did Doyle struggle thus?
A. In order, perhaps, to gain time for collecting fortitude.
14
Q. When Doyle came to the ladder, what did he then do?
A. He threw himself on his knees, begging of the Colonel not to
flog him.
Q. What reply did the Colonel make to Doyle's entreaties?
A. He replied, that Doyle was a chicken-hearted fellow, and would
be soon compelled to declare what he knew or had to say.
Q. What was next done with Doyle?
A. He was tied up to the ladder and received fifty lashes on his
bare back.
Q. What was Mr. Fitzgerald doing, during the infliction of the
torture?
A. Walking up and down, sometimes three or four yards from the
ladder, but mostly at the ladder
Q. Did the Colonel say any thing on hearing Doyle moan?
A. He said, he only wanted Doyle to declare the truth.
Q. Did Doyle faint while under the torture or did his back bleed?
A. Doyle's back was bleeding, he fainted, and some person, whose
name I recollect not, called for some water for him.
Q. Was Doyle flogged again, after he recovered from fainting?
A. He was.
Q. What was Colonel Fitzgerald doing in the meantime?
A. He conversed with some Gentleman who seemed much affected.
Q. Can you call to mind any of the conversation that he passed?
A. Yes; a Mr. Wall in particular, told the
15
Colonel the informer was a man of the most infamous
character.
Q. What was next done to Doyle?
A. His breeches-strings were now cut, and Mr. Fitzgerald said,
double or quit.
Q. Where was the Colonel during this flogging, and what did he say
to Doyle?
A. Quite close to the ladder, repeatedly desiring Doyle to tell the
truth.
Q. Where were the second fifty lashes inflicted?
A. On the bare breech.
Q. Were these parts cut?
A. Severely cut.
Q. Did the plaintiff Doyle address Mr. Fitzgerald during this
second flogging?
A. Yes, several times, but I was so affected I cannot recollect the
particulars.
Q. Did Fitzgerald say any thing to Doyle, when taken from the
ladder?
A. Yes, he told Doyle he should receive the same number again the
next day.
Q. Did you see or hear of any disturbance in Carrick on that day?
A. I saw not the least symptom of disturbance while I was there.
Cross-examined by Defendant's Counsel.
Q. About what time did you reach Carrick that morning?
A. About eight of the clock in the morning.
Q. Did you hear of any informations received by Mr. Fitzgerald or
Parsons, relative to the alarming state of Carrick then?
A. I did not hear of any such.
16
[On being asked by defendant's counsel as to his belief of
any such informations being given, Mr. O'Driscol, of counsel for the plaintiff,
objected to his giving in evidence, his belief thereon, as in the case of Wright
versus Fitzgerald, which was an action of a similar nature with the present,
Lord Yelverton, assisted by Mr. Justice Chamberlain, would not permit the
defendant to give in evidence a written information on which he acted.]
Q. Did you hear of believe that any of Captain Jephson's corps
acknowledged themselves United Irishmen after the flogging?
A. I heard and
believe they did, in a few days after.
Q. Was not your brother's house, about
twenty-six or twenty-seven miles from Carrick, robbed of arms?
A. It was, but
the arms were returned in three or four months after.
Q. Do you believe Colonel
Fitzgerald and Doyle were acquainted before this time?
A. I believe they were
perfect strangers to each other.
Q. Do you believe the defendant acted thus from
pure motives?
A. Yes from the purest and most loyal motives.
Rev. James Smyth sworn and examined by Plaintiff's Counsel.
Q. How did you and Colonel Fitzgerald become acquainted?
A. I
got myself introduced to him, in order to intercede with him for the priest of
my parish.
17
Q. Had you any conversation with him respecting Devany?
A.
Yes, I told him Devany was a man of a very infamous character.
Q. What were your
reasons for believing and thinking so?
A. Because I was present at Waterford
Spring Assizes, 1798, when Lord Yelverton turned Devany off the table, and
ordered him to be confined for perjury.
Q. Did any other Gentleman apprize
Colonel Fitzgerald of Devany's bad character?
A. Yes; Charles William Wall, of
Coolnamuck, Esq; also apprized him of it.
[It being object, that this was not admissible evidence, Lord
Avonmore declared it as his opinion, that it was, as he took it for granted that
Devany's informations would be produced, the examination proceeded.]
Q. Were you present when Doyle was flogged?
A. I was at the
beginning, but was so shocked that I afterwards went away.
Q. Did Doyle beg of
the Colonel to grant him a trial?
A. Though on his knees, imploring for a trial
from the Colonel, adding, that if found guilty he would willingly forfeit his
head, nay his life; yet Doyle got no trial of any sort whatsoever, but was tied
up in a few minutes after.
Q. Was Captain Jephson then expected?
A. He was every
moment expected, as several messengers went for him.
Q. Who flogged Francis
Doyle?
A. Two drummers, who attended on the sheriff, Colonel Fitzgerald.
18
Q. How were the lashes laid on?
A. They were severely and
dreadfully inflicted.
Q. Do you know Doyle this long time?
A. I know him for
several years past.
Q. What is Doyle's general character?
A. He has always borne
the character of an honest, industrious, and loyal man. Cross-examined by
Defendant's Counsel.
Q. Don't you believe that the county Tipperary was in an
alarming state at the time?
A. In a dreadful state, indeed.
Q. Do you believe
that any regular system was then organized for assisting the Ross rebels in
their co-operation with those of Wexford?
A. I heard of such, but I did not
believe their was any foundation for it.
Q. Did you never hear that General Fox
gave such information?
A. I never did.
Q. Did you hear that several of Captain
Jephson's yeomen corps were United Irishmen?
A. I believe that in his corps
there were some United Irishmen, according to the original acceptation of that
Society; but I do not believe they were rebels: but which I mean United
Irishmen, deeply implicated in the rebellion.
Q. What is your belief as to the
loyalty of Doyle's family?
A. There is not, or cannot be a more respectable or
loyal family.
Q. Were any of Doyle's brothers implicated in the rebellion?
A.
None of his brothers were in the least concerned in the rebellion.
19
Q. Did not magistrates from your town apply for military aid
to government?
A. I heard they did.
Q. Do you not believe that Quin acknowledged
himself a rebel?
A. I believe he did.
Q. Was not Quin a yeoman in Captain
Jephson's corps?
A. He was.
Q. Pray, Sir, what is your motive for being so
interested in Doyle's cause, as to come forward with your testimony thus in his
favour?
A. Had I not believed Doyle a loyal and injured man, I should not thus
interest myself in his behalf, or support him with my testimony.
Q. What are
your reasons for supposing Doyle a loyal man?
A. My reasons for believing Doyle
a loyal man, are founded on the company he kept, as he was always a young man of
a serious cast, always associating with the grave and respectable inhabitants of
the town, and never consorting with the thoughtless, giddy or profligate of his
own age.
Joseph Anthony Esq., and examined by Plaintiff's Counsel.
Q. Have you seen Doyle on the 22nd June, 1798, in Carrick?
A. I
saw him on his knees, begging for a trial from Colonel Fitzgerald, who was
unmoved by his entreaties.
Q. Did Colonel Fitzgerald take any notice of what
Doyle then said?
A. He made no reply whatsoever to Doyle.
20.
Q. Did you speak to Colonel Fitzgerald in behalf of Doyle
then?
A. I requested of Colonel Fitzgerald, in the most pressing manner, to
postpone the flogging for a quarter of an hour, or ten minutes.
Q. What reply
did Colonel Fitzgerald make to your request?
A. He asked, why I requested that
delay ; I answered, because Captain Jephson was instantly expected to town , as
a messenger just returned, who said he left the Captain on the road very near
the town.
Q. What did the Colonel say then ?
A. He said Captain Jephson had no
right to interfere in his business.
Q. In what posture was Doyle during this
conversation ?
A. His coat was off and his shirt was open.
Q. Were you on duty
on Carrick on that day ?
A. I was as an officer, and in the uniform of my corps.
Q. Were you long before in Carrick ? Do you know Doyle's character?
A. I was for
a month before in Carrick; have been often enough there to have a perfect
knowledge of the inhabitants, and know Doyle to have always conducted himself as
an honest, industrious and loyal man.
Q. Did any other Gentleman intercede for
Doyle?
A. Yes ; Charles William Wall, Esq; also applied in his behalf, but to no
purpose, as the Colonel made no reply to him, only desired the Drummers do their
duty;
Q. Did Colonel Fitzgerald shew you a list of those informed against?
A. He
did shew me a list, and gave it to me in order to read it.
21
Cross-examined by Defendant's Counsel
Q. Do you recollect to have seen Doyle's name in the list?
A. I
believe the name of Doyle was in the list ?
Q. Was there any symptom of
disturbance in Carrick then?
A. I saw no appearance of symptom of disturbance in
or about Carrick at that time, except the rout occasioned by the Sheriff's
proceedings.
Q. Do you know a man of the name of Brazil in that neighbourhood ?
A. Yes, and I believe him to be a great rebel.
Q. What is your opinion of
Devany's character?
A. That he was a most infamous character.
Charles William Wall, Esq. sworn and examined by Plaintiff's
Counsel
Q. You know Colonel Fitzgerald, I presume ?
A. I do ; I am
married to a relation of his.
Q. Did you see Colonel Fitzgerald on the day of
Doyle's flogging ?
A. I did ; I met Colonel Fitzgerald before Doyle's flogging.
And hearing that it on Devany's evidence he was to be punished, I informed the
Colonel that Devany was a man of the most infamous character ; and in Devany's
presence, I told Colonel Fitzgerald, that being on the Grand jury of the County
Waterford, I saw Devany turned off to the dock from the table for perjury, by
Lord Avonmore's directions.
22
Q. What reply did the Sheriff make to this ?
A. Nothing ; but
Devany answering, said to me, "you lie, and the Lord of Tyrone knows better
than you."
Q. Had you any further conversation with the Colonel respecting
Doyle ?
A. I told him Doyle was an honest, quiet and loyal man ; and then I
withdrew, on seeing Doyle prepared for punishment.
Cross-examined by Defendant's Counsel
Q. Have you not heard that many of Captain Jephson's corps were
United Irishmen ?
A. I have heard there were some United Irishmen in his corps.
Q. Which was it before or after the flogging they gave themselves up?
A. I heard
it was after the flogging they were found out.
Q. Were you not obliged to remove
out of that country ?
A. I did, in some time after.
Q. For what reason ?
A. On
account of the dreadful state in which the country was then.
Q. Did you know a
man of the name of Brazil, in that neighbourhood ?
A. I did ; he was turned out
of the corps to which I belonged.
Q. Did he not attack a Gentleman's house in
your vicinity ?
A. He, with some others, attacked the house of
Mr. Mansfield, in
my neighbourhood.
Q. When was this attack on Mr. Mansfield's house ? A. It was in
September, 1799.
23
Q. Did you not dread an attack on your own house ?
A. I did
for some time after.
Q. Don't you believe, and did you not hear this prosecution
is supported by subscription ? A. I never heard it was.
John Power, Esq. M. D. sworn and examined by Plaintiff's Counsel
Q. Were you not called in to attend Doyle after the flogging ?
A. I was.
Q. How soon after the flogging did you attend on him ?
A. About three
or four hours afterwards.
Q. In what state did you find him ?
A. He was severely
mangled and bruised.
Q. How long did you attend him then ?
A. About twenty days.
Q. How long was it 'till Doyle recovered of the wounds ?
A. In about twenty-one
Days.
Q. Has this flogging affected Doyle's general health ?
A. I believe it
has.
Q. What are your reasons for believing so ?
A. Because since that time he
has been subject to bilious complaints, of which I have not known him to
complain before, and which I attribute to the outrage committed against him.
Q.
Was not Doyle's wife also indisposed at that time ?
A. She was.
24
Cross-examined by Defendant's Counsel
Q. Pray, Sir, are you not by profession a Doctor in Physic?
A. I
am.
Q. Will you take it upon you to swear that Doyle might not have been
affected with this bilious complaint without the flogging?
A. I will not
Here evidence on behalf of the plaintiff closed.
Colonel Fitzgerald, the defendant, stated his own case; and in a
long, bold speech, addressed the Jury nearly as follows:
It is with great satisfaction I present myself before you, this
day, in order to vindicate my honour and reputation; and, happy for me,
Gentlemen of the Jury, that you know what I have atchieved [sic] and undergone,
both abroad and at home, for my king and country. To you, Gentlemen, it is well
known, that when first I was invested with the dignified office of High Sheriff
of the county of Tipperary, the whole resembled a great volcano; a hidden subtile
flame pervaded through every part, ready to burst forth on some
unexpected event, and bury all in one indiscriminate heap of ruin and
devastation. To you, Gentlemen of the Jury, it is well known, that your tenants,
dependants, and your very servants, were embodied and organized in one general
confederacy for massacreing [sic] you all. No private family was safe. Your
domestics were all
25
sworn rebels. In this time of universal apprehension and
alarm, I came forward; I interposed my powers (a general laugh.) Yes, Gentlemen,
I acknowledge I exceeded my powers, but for what? To protect your properties,
and save you all from the hands of assassination and massacre. At the very
gallows, I often offered pardon to criminals sentenced by the Judges of the
land. (Here again the court was discomposed by a general laugh). Yes, I
suspended executions, on condition that they would become approvers, give useful
information, and deliver up their pikes; yet so infatuated were the unfortunate
people, that they would not discover; and why? Because they knew, that though
themselves suffered, their families would be supported. What did one man, more
than sixty years of age, at the place of execution, say? Why he said, I die
innocent, for I do not die for an action reputed a criminal offence among us.
I well knew, Gentlemen Jurors, that I had no power to stay
executions or grant pardons, however I did so, as supreme magistrate and
governour of the county, and standing in the king's place.
Thus, Gentlemen, you all know, that every method hitherto
adopted for procuring information, proved ineffectual. Free quarters had been
triedburning houses had been triedall to no purpose. They were productive
of no information. The magistrates of the county, alarmed at this dreadful state
of affairs, were convened at Cashel, on the 27th March, 1798. Here a Secret
Committee was sworn in, and three thousand pounds subscribed. By this mode,
however, no information could be procured.
I then adopted other measures more efficacious and decisive in
their operation. Were there any
26
discoveries made? Yes. Were any informations received? Yes.
Was the rebellion detected? Yes. Did rebels acknowledge? Yes. Was their system
disorganized? Yes, Gentlemen. Where? Every where. By whom? By me. This time
three years ago, I came into this court, I stated what I had done; and for my
conduct, and the propriety of the measures I adopted, received the thanks of the
Judges of the Court, of the county at large, and of the government of the
country.
On the conviction of Roger O'Connor, I found this county was to
rise. I went to Dublin, and I informed Government of the matter. A man of the
name of Brien O'Leary, resided at Nenagh, in this county: he was then the chief
rebel of the place, though at that time I thought him an honest man, and as
such, I must acknowledge, I gave him a pass on the recommendation of a
neighbouring Gentleman, a Mr. Kingsley, to go to Dublin. But what use did he
make of this pass? Why, upon his arrival in Dublin, he waited on Lord Edward
Fitzgerald, and had repeated interviews with him, respecting the organization
and subsequent arrangement of his district. On the 12th of May, 1709, I convened
a meeting of the Magistrates at Nenagh; and having information that they were
busily employed in organizing and getting ready their pikes and arms about that
district, I came to Nenagh again, and on the 16th I got some flogged. Then I got
more informations, which confirmed all in the opinion of a general rising.
The baronies of both Lower and Upper Ormond having been thus
organized, I sent notices to the several chapels, that I would attend to receive
their submission
27
and their pikes, and grant them pardon upon informing against
and delivering up their leaders. So I myself went in their chapels, I informed
them of my being in full possession of their rebellious practices, and earnestly
exhorted them from the very altar to come in, being in their arms, give in the
names of their seducers, their serjeants, and such officers of their districts
as they knew. Thus many came in, confessed their crimes, and gave up their
leaders arms, both at Knocksheegownah, Nenagh, and elsewhere, in the parishes
and public places where I preached; and you all know, Gentlemen, that I was
poisoned at Nenagh; (here the Colonel was for some time interrupted by an
involuntary burst of laughter through the whole court, which as soon as it was
somewhat composed, the Colonel resuming his oration said ) Yes, Gentlemen, I say
I was poisoned in Nenagh, but God in his infinite mercy preserved me.
For obtaining informations, detecting rebellion, and enforcing
discovery, I acknowledge, Gentlemen, that I adopted decisive measures and
illegal means. Yes, I still avow it, but I have got the sanctions of Government
for them. I have the protections of Parliament, which passed the Indemnity Acts
in my favour. Such acts are perfectly agreeable to our constitution, as may be
seen by a perusal of Littleton, Coke, and other lawyers and statesmen's works.
Such acts of amnesty passed often in England. Has not an act of amnesty passed
in the 12th of Charles the Second? One passed even in 1658. Was there not one
here in the reign of King William? And every body knows that an indemnity act
passed in the year 1715, and a similar one in 1745.
28
Need I mention Lord Carhampton? You all know he would not be
alive to-day, but for an indemnity bill passed in his favour; and must I alone
be denied that protection, who by my spirited conduct have prevented the
rebellion from spreading.
You all know the general signal for rising throughout the whole
kingdom was, the burning of the mail-coaches. A fire was to have been lighted on
Oxmantown-hill. General Egan was to have risen at Nenagh. General Egan was to
have opposed the army of Sir James Duff. General Fox was to have attached
Captain Milward, to have his right wing extended to Carrick, his left to Roscrea,
and to have seized upon Cashel. But in the mean time the plan was totally
disorganized by General Fox's being apprehended. He was immediately brought to
Clonmell. I informed Mr. Jacob here, who is a magistrate of your county, of what
I had discovered respecting General Fox, and his rebellious measures. My worthy
friend Jacob (than who there exists not a more honourable, gallant, and loyal
man) went to General Fox, then in confinement, and begged of him to acknowledge
what he knew respecting the rebellion. General Fox not only persisted in
declaring his total ignorance of the rebel organization, but so far persuaded
Mr. Jacob of his innocence, that Jacob interceded for him with me, as for an
injured man. Fox was then sick. On the 23d of May, the mail-coaches were stopped
and burned. The judge were prevented from arriving, and every rebel was up and
appeared with his arms and uniform. In this emergency, I waited on General St.
John, addressed him on the state of affairs, and suggested to him
29
the propriety of adopting vigorous measures. I then brought
out General Fox, and flogged him. On General Fox's receiving one hundred and
eleven lashes, he who heretofore so strongly persisted in the avowal of his
innocence, declared that he was a rebel general: that he was in company with
Lord Edward Fitzgerald, who shewed him a map of the county of Tipperary,
parceled out into subdivisional sections, and that a general was sent down to
command the whole.
General Fox also informed against Colonel Devereux of Callan,
and Colonel Quin of Carrick-on-Suir; same time declaring, that the Carrick
Yeomen were all rebels. General Fox said, that the rising in this county was to
be on the 29th of May; and that Colonel Devereux was to meet Colonel Quin and
Colonel O'Brien at Clonmel, for the final adjustment of that business; and that
the rebels were sixty thousand strong. All this General Fox declared before
Colonel Deering, of the Romney Fencibles. I sent for Captain Jephson, and before
him and Colonel Burton of the Clare Militia, had General Fox again examined, who
confessed the whole of their plan, and the part that Captain Jephson's corps of
Carrick Yeomen were to act; that they amounted to 112 men, and that half that
number were sworn rebels, who were to be under the command of Colonel Quin.
General Fox also informed against other rebels officers and generals at the same
time. Fox left Dublin on the 22nd of May, and on his way down he dropt a general
officer at Naas, another officer at Carlow, and came here himself.
I sent orders to Carrick to have Colonel Quin taken up, and
forwarded me to Clonmel, where I got him flogged, but refusing to confess, I de-
30
livered him to Colonel Burton, in order to be put to
death. Colonel O'Brien went to the fair of Ballingary on the 28th of May, in
order to organize for the intended rising, and to ascertain how far the
expedition against Clonmel was likely to succeed. Colonel O'Brien, however, was
taken up in Fethard on his way hither, and requesting time to shave himself, he
cut his throat. His reasons for so doing (as afterwards found by a note among
other papers in his pocket-book) were, that he could not bear the tortures of a
flogging, and therefore he made away with himself, lest he may be forced to
betray his honour or his accomplices.
Having thus obtained ample informations of the whole system of
rebellion, and got possession of the rebel generals and commanders, whom I
delivered up to General St. John, I went to Killenaule, where I met fifteen
hundred rebels, who all acknowledged their guilt, and gave up their arms. Here I
was also informed by one Mara, that Wells, who is plaintiff in another action of
a similar nature with the present against me, and who only awaits the issue of
this, was an officer among the rebels. He is a yeoman of Captain Jephson's
corps, and was to have possessed himself of Carrick.
On thus discovering the organization of his Yeomen, and the
alarming state of Carrick, so convinced was Captain Jephson of the necessity of
having a military guard for the protection of that town, that he applied to
General St. John for some of the Hompesch regiment, some flank companies, and
some artillery: which on entering the town, found it illuminated, as they all
had candles lighting in their windows: all this may
31
be seen in General St.
John's orderly book, which must be allowed to be good evidence in my behalf.
Neither was it from my own head I went to Carrick; for I was directed by General
St. John, upon his receiving the informations of Devany, forwarded to him from
Thurles by Captain Cheshire. I even refused to comply, unless the informer was
sent along with me, in order to identify the rebels there, and unless I was
invested with full powers on the occasion; and I can prove by the evidence of
Cosgrave here, that Devany gave me full information, on which I repeatedly
refused to act, until he persisted in his knowledge of those persons who swore
him in as a United Irishman. When I arrived at Carrick, as I had informations
against Wells, I ordered him to the ladder, and flogged him. While I was there,
Captain Jephson arrived, came up to me in the centre of the town, and told me,
that sooner than I should proceed in this manner, he would put himself at the
head of his corps, and fire upon me. I drew out my men, I defied him, and I
flogged two more afterwards. I did it in order to prevent the rebels at Carrick
from attacking the rere [sic] of the military at Ross.
I flogged them, I avow it, though they were all innocent then.
Yes, I did flog them; but what was the consequence? twenty-six of the Carrick
Yeomen then acknowledged to Captain Jephson, that they were United Irishmen, and
six more confessed next morning. Then it was that Captain Jephson applied for
the men. Then it was that Colonel Leggett was ordered down to Carrick, in order
to take up Captains Carey, Foran, and Carrigan; one of whom, on being brought
up, said, you must flog me first, as I have
32
a wife and children at home, who would inevitably starve, if
I informed, until I was forced to it by the application of the torture.
So convinced were General St. John and Captain Jephson of the
necessity of applying the torture, that they requested of me to continue it, and
flog other rebels, as they now adopted a new oath, which was, not to make any
discoveries with respect to their accomplices, until forced thereto by the
torture and the flogging. At Coolnamuck, near Carrick, there was a great meeting
of the rebel officers convened at one Wall's. Here, General McCabe, Commander in
Chief of the Munster forces, Colonel Devereaux from Callan, and Colonel Quin of
Carrick, with seven or eight of the Carrick Yeomen, assisted for the purpose of
settling the plan of attack against Clonmel, and such other means as may tend to
promote the interest and ends of the United Irishmen, but all their schemes I
frustrated by my timely and decisive measures.
Among you, Gentlemen, who compose that Jury, do I not see some
who were to be boiled in their own coppers ? do I not see others who were to be
roasted alive ? and were not all of you to be murdered by your own very
favourite servants, had not my timely exertions totally counteracted their
system and frustrated their schemes of organization and massacre.
Yet, Gentlemen of the Jury, you all see that this dreadful
spirit of proscription and assassination has not yet subsided ; as is evident to
you all, Gentlemen, from the recent murder of Mr. Price, a gentleman of the most
amiable manners, humane disposition, and benevolent heart, who was assassinated
on his own ground, and in the noonday!
33
You see then, Gentlemen of the Jury, the necessity of that
timely severity employed by me for putting down rebellion and preserving you.
Were it not for my vigorous endeavours, not one among you would have a head on
his shoulders before now. And must the immaculate Quin be allowed to enjoy
himself in peace and tranquillity in Carrick, and I thus persecuted ? Must
Colonel Devereaux be permitted to taste the sweets of security and happiness in
Callan, while I am thus forced to stand here as an object of proscription,
supported by the public contribution of protected rebels.
It may be asked, Gentlemen of the Jury, by what authority I have
presumed to act thus. Standing in my sovereign's place, I considered myself
invested with his power. In the king's absence I hold the authority by virtue of
my office as High Sheriff, and as such am empowered by my commission to command
the troops. Nay, should his majesty be present in person, I as chief magistrate
of the county, would command on his right.
In the time of terror and trepidation, when I took it upon me
the administration of your county, all was sunk into distrust, apathy, and
dismay. But by my strong measures, treason was soon discovered, traitors hunted
down, and the rebellion quelled. Are you not all, Gentlemen, witnesses to my
manly exertions for the preservation of your lives and properties?
Have I not routed the revels in every direction, from the
Shannon to the Suir ? And have I not thereby cut off all communications between
the Munster and Leinster rebels. As the strength of the rebellion was now
founded on the murder of
34
all informers, I was under the necessity of concealing their
names.
You all know, Gentlemen of the Jury, that according to the
preconcerted plan of the union, the rebels stopped the mail-coaches near Lucan,
at Santry, and Kilcullen, on the 23d, and broke or burnt them, and that there
was a general rising in the counties of Carlow, Kildare, Dublin, Westmeath,
Wexford, and Wicklow.
[Here Colonel Fitzgerald entered into a minute detail of the
various operations of the King's forces with the rebels, and with their
skirmishes and battles ; as also the battle of Ross, on the 6th of June, and of
Vinegar-Hill on the 20th of the same month ; with the massacres of Scullabogue,
and on the bridge of Wexford, the former on the 5th, and the latter on the 20th
of June, &c.&c.&c. (when Lord Avonmore rising from the bench, said,
"I declare to God, my patience has been exhausted ; as for an hour and a
half's attendance here, I have not heard five minutes argument to the point. But
he is just like a puppet-shew man, with his magic lanthorn playing off his
various tricks, and crying out, "Here you shall see Jack o-the lanthorn,
then Will-o-the-Wisp---here the battle of Ross---there the Battle of
Vinegar-Hill, and the Devil and Doctor Faustus !" with such unmeaning
trash) the Colonel then resuming his speech, said in a low voice : That the
country would be in a bad state, if there was nothing to be adduced but legal
evidence ; then proceeding in a loud tone of voice as before, he said ]
I am next, Gentlemen, to shew you, quo
animo, or whether I had a
malicious intent on my departure for Carrick. You all know, Gentlemen, from my
puerile age, I have been always a stout,
35
spirited, magnanimous, and merciful youth. By General St.
John's orderly-book (which you must allow to be admissible evidence) you may see
the state of Carrick, whither I went by order of General St. John, with the
informer Devany.
[Then the Defendant began to read some letters address to him by
General St. John, when Lord Avonmore prevented him, conceiving them not to be
admissible evidence.]
You see, Gentlemen, I had General St. John's approbation and
directions for going to Carrick ; and though the gentlemen of that town were
white-washed by that gentleman there (alluding as is supposed, to the Rev. Mr.
Smyth) yet you see the immediate good effects that followed from my flogging
there. Discovery followed from it, and the rebels there were thus timely
prevented from co-operating with those of Waterford, who were then ready to
rise, but were kept down by the timely arrival of the Roscommon Militia from
Ross to that city. Since I undertook the office of Sheriff of your county, have
I not done everything for the general welfare of all ? have not the lives of
loyal subjects been saved through my means ? I have taken up thirty-six
car-loads of pike-heads, and twenty-two thousand stand of arms : and during my
whole administration of that important office, I have done nothing through
private pique, peevishness, or self-interest. No, I have done nothing on the
whole but what was honourable, tender hearted, and humane.
It has been said, Gentlemen of the Jury, that I have kept back
my trial these two years past; the reverse is the case. I applied in this court
a year ago to bring it forward before Judge Kelly. I would have then benefited
by General St. John's
36
testimony, of which I cannot avail myself now. Then frivolous
causes were heard, and mine rejected. I have been since ordered on foreign
service to Minorca and other parts, whither I am immediately to return, on the
issue of this trial, a trial by which I have been five thousand pounds out of
pocket already.
I shall only add, Gentlemen of the Jury, that I have cut off all
communication between the Munster and Leinster rebels, and have prevented the
rising which took place at Cashell and Carrick-a-Chlear, from becoming general.
To your consideration, Gentlemen, I submit the propriety of my conduct ; well
knowing, that in the determination of my cause, you will never, I am sure,
punish me for my loyalty.
Peter Hynes sworn and examined by Defendant's Counsel
Q. Are you keeper of Clonmel jail ?
A. I am, Sir.
Q. Do you know
where was Devany sent from your jail ?
A. He was sent from this to Geneva, and
as I afterwards heard by general reputation (which Lord Avonmore admitted to be
evidence of the fact) he was sent from New Geneva to Chatham ; but I cannot say
whether as a recruit or as a convict.
[ Here Lord Avonmore declared that before they could give
Devany's declaration in evidence, they must shew, that they used due diligence
for ascertaining what was become of him ; but as that was not then done, his
lordship could not admit Devany's informations, to be read.
37
Captain Cheshire sworn and examined by Defendant's Counsel
Q. Do you recollect a prisoner of the name of Devany being in
custody with your men, when quartered in Thurles?
A. I do.
Q. Did he communicate
any informations to you?
A. He did, he swore to examinations before me.
Q. Pray
Sir, are you a magistrate?
A. I am not.
Q. What did you do with these
informations?
A. I transmitted them to Colonel Deering, and by his directions
sent them afterwards to Colonel Fitzgerald.
[Here Captain Cheshire was shewn a paper, which he identified,
as the informations he enclosed to the Colonel, and which the defendant's
counsel offered to read in evidence, but they were objected to, as not being on
oath, having been sworn before a person, who was not empowerd to administer an
oath. Lord Avonmore thought the letters and informations given by any one to
Colonel Fitzgerald admissible evidence, to shew the intent with which he acted.
How else could the Jury judge whether he acted from malice or otherwise ? The
informations were now read, and in them it was stated, that the name of Doyle,
and several others whose names were mentioned therein, were rebels.
38
John Cosgrave sworn and examined by Defendant's Counsel
Q. Are you not a police-officer ?
A. I am.
Q. Was the man whom
the Sheriff flogged at Carrick, on 22 June 1798, the Doyle whom Devany swore
against ?
A. I believe he was, as Devany pointed him out.
Cross examined by Plaintiff's Counsel
Q. Pray, Sir, is there no other man of the name of Doyle at
Carrick, who was implicated in the rebellion ? A. Yes, Sir, there was the
plaintiff's first cousin, whose name is Richard Doyle. Q. Would you know that
man ? is he in court ? A. I would know him. He is now in court. Q. Take the rod,
and point him out.
[ Here the witness took the rod, and pointed to James Doyle, a
brother to the plaintiff Francis Doyle, who was not at all implicated in the
rebellion.]
Q. Pray, Sir, do you know the plaintiff's character ?
A. I know
him to have always been an honest, industrious and loyal man.
Q. May not Devany
have mistaken Francis Doyle, the Plaintiff, for his cousin Richard Doyle, who
was implicated in the rebellion ?
A. He may.
Q. Pray, Sir, what was Devany's
general character ?
39
A. He was well known in the country, to be a man of the most
infamous character.
Q. Were you present at the flogging ?
A. I was, and counted
the strokes by Colonel Fitzgerald's directions.
Lieutenant Ducket sworn and examined by Defendant's Counsel
Q. Pray, sir, where were you on 22d June, 1798 ?
A. I went to
Carrick-on-Suir with some of the Germans, by Colonel St. John's orders.
Q. Were
there any appearances of rebellion in Carrick on that day ?
A. I saw no
appearance of rebellion there.
Q. In what state was the country then ?
A. It was
in a very bad state.
Cross-examined by Plaintiff's Counsel
Q. Did you see the Plaintiff Doyle on that day ?
A. I saw him on
his knees.
Q. Did you hear that Doyle was a man of very good character for
loyalty and honesty?
A. I heard and believe Doyle always had a good character
for loyalty ; I heard it given him that day.
Q. Pray, Sir, could not Colonel
Fitzgerald give Doyle a trial that day ?
A. He could, if he pleased.
Colonel O'Connor sworn and examined by Defendant's Counsel
Q. You are the Colonel of the Nottingham Fencibles.
A. I am.
40
Q. Were you in any command on 22d of June 1798 ?
A. I was
second in command under general St. John.
Q. Where is general St John now ?
A.
He is gone to the East Indies.
Q. In what state was the country then ?
A. It was
in a bad state, we apprehended an attack on Clonmell and other towns.
Q. Did
Captain Jephson make any application for the military aid at that time ?
A. He
did, in three days after the flogging.
Q. What were the orders given the
military on that occasion ?
A. The orders given the party were, to stop at this
side of Carrick, and to keep close together.
[ Here witness proved a letter which was produced and shewn him,
was in the hand-writing of General St. John. Witness was also shown a letter
signed William Bagwell, which he proved to be the hand-writing of William
Bagnell, a Brigade-major. It bore date June the sixth 1798, was directed to the
Defendant, and among other expressions state to Mr. Fitzgerald that, " If
he found " good to arise from flogging, he may go " on with it, but
not to let it reach his " ears." ]
Laurence Hickey Jephson, Esq. Captain of the Carrick Corps of
Yeoman Infantry, sworn and examined by Plaintiff's Counsel, in order to rebut
the Case made for the Defendant.
Q. Pray, Sir, do you recollect your having
41
a conversation with General St. John about Mr. Fitzgerald's
conduct in Carrick ?
A. I do : I complained to general St. John of Colonel
Fitzgerald's behaviour in Carrick, at which General St. John was very angry, and
declared that Fitzgerald was a man not to be trusted, and that he himself would
never trust him again.
Q. Do you know Doyle ?
A. I do, and know him to be a
remarkable loyal man.
Q. Did you know Devany's character then ?
A. Yes, he was a
man of the most infamous character.
Q. What were your reasons for writing for
troops ?
A. I wrote for troops for two reasons ; first, because I thought, that
from Colonel Fitzgerald's conduct no loyal yeoman would bear arms. This I
thought from the despair manifested by the inhabitants of the country, on
hearing of the flogging. Secondly, I was afraid that not only the Yeomen would
not bear arms, but that the cruelty exercised in inflicting the torture, would
infuse the spirit of disloyalty into the most loyal, and consequently encourage
the disaffected rebels.
Q. What is your opinion of the Sheriff's conduct then ?
A. I am clearly of the opinion, that such a conduct was calculated to promote
rebellion ; for had it not been for my being possessed of superior information,
the oath of allegiance I had taken, the property I had in the country, and my
being Captain of a Yeomanry Corps, I would, on seeing such wanton cruelty, have
joined the rebels.
42.
Cross-examined by Defendant's Counsel.
Q. Do you not believe that Colonel Fitzgerald acted from pure
motives.
A. I am of opinion he did not act from pure motives, but rather with a
view to private emolument.
Q. What are your reasons for suspecting the purity of
his motives?
A. I should have no reasons for suspecting the purity of his
motives, had he not accepted a regiment from government; but by his present
situation, I consider his conduct to have been influenced by a desire of
rendering himself conspicuous, and thereby obtaining a reward from government.
Here the evidence on both sides closed.
LORD AVONMORE, with those comprehensive, clear and
discriminating powers, for which his Lordship is so eminently distinguished,
summed up the evidence on both sides, in his charge to the Jury, of which the
following is an abstract:
This, Gentlemen, is an action brought to recover damages from
the defendant, Colonel Fitzgerald, for an act admitted to be against law. The
defendant himself has repeatedly told us so, and, lest we may not believe him,
he has quoted Coke and Littleton to convince us. If, therefore, the acts of
indemnity which have been cited to you had not passed, no damages, that you
could
43
give, would be too great. These statutes recite the existence
of a rebellion in the country, and the illegal acts exercised by several
magistrates and officers for its suppression; under these acts, if you believe
that the defendant was forced, through imperious necessity, to commit this
abominable outrage against the plaintiff, a man of acknowledged loyalty, you are
certainly bound to find for him.
The defendant has told you, that he has acted from information;
but what are these informations? They are the informations of a vile, perjured
and infamous informer, and these too, not upon oath.
The justification of his conduct he has also rested upon the two
letters he has received from General St. John and a Major Bagwell; but,
Gentlemen, let us look at the letter of the 6th of June, long before the
perpetration of the wanton outrage here complained of. What does that letter
authorise him to do? It advises him to bring all suspected people to a
court-martial, and directs him to enforce confessions according to law; but
should it appear to him that other methods not warranted by law, should be
deemed necessary - to adopt them - and act in such a manner, at least, as it may
not reach his ears.
You all see, Gentlemen, that the plaintiff is a man of
acknowledged loyalty. The Gentlemen of the country, nay the witnesses for the
defendant, have borne ample testimony to his loyalty. Yet, Gentlemen, can it be
credited, that the defendant refused them a respite of even ten minutes. For you
it is, Gentlemen, to determine whether his conduct has arisen from impe-
44
rious necessity, and was more likely to promote the cause of
loyalty, than to fill the mind of every one with disgust, and inspire the
well-disposed with sentiments of abhorrence and disaffection.
Much, Gentlemen, has been here spoken respecting loyalty; and,
left the clamours of pretended loyalty should drown all considerations of
justice, it is incumbent on me to inform you what loyalty is, and in what true
loyalty consists. Loyalty is another term for legality; and he who acts with
legality, acts in strict conformity to the laws. That man therefore is to be
esteemed the most loyal, who is a steady and faithful adherent to his lawful
prince, and a strenuous supporter of the established constitution, by paying due
obedience to the laws of his country, respecting social order, and preserving
every member of the state in his just rights and possessions.
Another ground of defence has been set up, that the town of
Carrick-on-Suir had then been in a disturbed state; but, Gentlemen, the evidence
of both plaintiff and defendant negative that idea, as from the joint testimony
of their witnesses it manifestly appears, that there was no manner of
disturbance in that industrious town; nay, that all were in the most profound
state of composure and tranquillity, until wantonly disturbed by the outrageous
conduct of the defendant.
It has been said, that there was no kind of personal
acquaintance between the plaintiff and defendant, and that consequently no
personal malignity could exist between them; But I consider it my duty to tell
you, that personal malice is not
45
necessary to be proved; but a depraved and general
indisposition towards mankind. To find for the defendant, you must not only
believe that there was no malignity in his general conduct, but that the
commission of the outrage complained of, was absolutely necessary to put down
rebellion. Not that it was so in the defendant's opinion, but that its probable
consequences may be such; for you cannot suppose that the Legislature meant to
indemnify a man for perpetrating wanton and unnecessary cruelties or acts, which
in the mind of every rational person were alone calculated rather to excite and
promote than to suppers insurrection and rebellion.
True it is, Gentlemen, one of the witnesses on behalf of the
plaintiff, said that he believed Colonel Fitzgerald acted from pure motives. If
you attach a full belief to the testimony of that witness, and are of opinion
that the act was likely to suppress rebellion you must find for the defendant.
It is my duty to inform you, Gentlemen, that your verdict, in that case, will
saddle the plaintiff with double costs. Should you not think so, but entertain
an opinion that the defendant's motives were malicious, or that the act was not
such as a prudent man would employ for suppressing rebellion and preserving the
public peace, it is your duty to find for the plaintiff. It is exclusively your
province to determine the amount of the damages. However (here his Lordship took
up the act and perused it) to render a verdict for the plaintiff of any avail,
you must find that the defendant acted maliciously, and not with the intent of
suppressing the rebellion or saving the state, according to the words of this
act, (throws it on the cushion) which places an insu-
46
perable bar between injury and redress, and sets all equity
and justice at defiance.
The Jury retired, and after half an hour's consultation, gave a
verdict in favour of the defendant.
In consequence of this verdict, the defendant entered judgment,
and issued an execution against the plaintiff for treble costs, to the amount of
nearly £450.
NAMES OF THE JURORS:
Edw Taylor, Esq. Foreman
William Quin
Stephen
Hastings
Richard
Millet
Purefoy
Poe
Southwell Moore
Wills
Crofts
William Despard
George
Tuttle
Richard White
Denis Duone
(?)
William Going, Esqs.
Sir T.J. Fitzgerald, Bt.Plaintiff.
Francis Doyle,
Defendant. |
Received from the Defendant,
Francis Doyle, Four Hundred and Twenty-our pounds two
shillings and eight pence Sterling, being |
the sum marked at the foot of the
Fieri Facias
directed to the Sheriff of the County of Tipperary in this cause.
Dated this second day of November, 1801.
|
SAMUEL WALLER,
Sub-Sheriff, County Tipperary.
£424 2 8
Transcribed by Patricia McGill, Agnes
McFarland, Ann Quinn, Karen Miele, Peggy Quinn, Don Kelly, Christina Hunt & Jude Wynne.